Incident · State breach notice (Massachusetts)
Wisner Baum data breach: a one-day network intrusion at the law firm, and files that may have left
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-15. By the cisonews.net Desk.
Wisner Baum, the law firm, says it detected unusual activity on its computer network on October 9, 2025. Its investigation found that an unauthorized third party had been in the network on October 8 and 9, 2025, and may have taken certain files. The files may have held names, driver's license numbers, bank account and routing numbers, and medical information. Letters are dated January 21, 2026. Massachusetts lists 258 residents.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| October 8, 2025 | Unauthorized access to the firm's network begins |
| October 9, 2025 | Wisner Baum detects unusual activity, secures its systems and brings in outside experts |
| January 21, 2026 | Letters |
| January 23, 2026 | Reports to Massachusetts (258 residents) and Vermont |
What happened at Wisner Baum?
The firm caught the intrusion within about a day. Its letter says it first became aware of the incident on October 9, 2025, when it detected unusual activity on its network, and that it secured its systems and engaged independent cybersecurity professionals. The investigation dated the start to October 8. The letter does not name the attacker, say how the network was entered, or mention ransomware.
One line stands out. The firm says it has taken all possible steps to help ensure that the data that may have been taken has been deleted. The letter does not say how deletion was sought or confirmed. The double extortion guide covers how notices describe stolen data and demands.
Why would a law firm have my medical and bank information?
The letter does not say whose files these were or why the firm held them. It lists the data that may have been in them: names, driver's license numbers, bank account and routing numbers, and medical information. The law firm breach notice guide compares other firms' letters. The guide to letters from a company you never dealt with explains how firms come to hold other people's documents.
What information was exposed?
| Record | People | Data it marks |
|---|---|---|
| Wisner Baum letter, Vermont copy (January 21, 2026) | Not given | Name, driver's license number, bank account and routing numbers, medical information |
| Massachusetts OCABR, report 2026-113 (January 23, 2026) | 258 | SSNs, driver's licenses |
The two records differ. The letter does not list Social Security numbers, while the Massachusetts record marks them. The letter lists bank account numbers and medical information, which the Massachusetts record does not mark. Letters to different people can carry different data lists, so both are kept as filed.
What is Wisner Baum offering?
Twelve months of single-bureau credit monitoring, a credit report and a credit score through Cyberscout, a TransUnion company, with fraud assistance. Enrollment had to happen within 90 days of the letter, so for a letter dated January 21, 2026 the window closed in April 2026. The firm says it has added stronger protections and more monitoring. The credit monitoring guide compares offers.
What the documents leave open
- How the outsider got into the network.
- Who took the data and what contact, if any, the firm had with them.
- The total number of people notified across all states.
How this disclosure's timing compares
Wisner Baum LLP disclosed 104 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 232 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 101 days.
Other legal & professional services incidents on cisonews.net
- Levin, Sedran & Berman, LLP, Breach notice, first disclosed November 12, 2026
- Employer Solutions Staffing Group, Breach notice, first disclosed November 12, 2026
- Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, Breach notice, first disclosed November 9, 2026
- Troutman Pepper Locke, Breach notice, first disclosed October 28, 2026; 63,358 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
- Baker & McKenzie, Breach notice, first disclosed October 27, 2026; 25,837 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
Sources
- 2026-01-21 · AWisner Baum LLP, notice letter filed with the Vermont Attorney General, published January 21, 2026
- 2026-11-15 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report (checked November 15, 2026), published November 15, 2026
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.