Skip to content
cisonews.net

Incident · State breach notice (California AG)

Levin Sedran & Berman data breach letter: files taken in October 2025, notices sent 13 months later

Published . Updated 2026-11-14. By the cisonews.net Desk.

Levin, Sedran & Berman, LLP, a Philadelphia law firm, is notifying people that their personal information may have been in files taken from its network. The firm identified potentially suspicious activity on or about October 7, 2025. Its letters are dated November 10, 2026, and the California attorney general posted the notice on November 12, 401 days after the activity was found. Massachusetts records 243 residents notified and Vermont records 59. No total has been published.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.

DateEvent
October 7, 2025Suspicious activity identified on the firm's network; investigation begins
October 5, 2026The firm finishes identifying contact details for the people involved
November 10, 2026Date on the letters
November 12, 2026Notice posted by the California attorney general and logged in Massachusetts and Vermont

What happened at Levin Sedran & Berman?

The firm says the investigation, run with cybersecurity experts, found that some of its files may have been accessed or acquired without authorization. It then reviewed the affected files, learned that certain people's information was in them, and searched for addresses so it could write to them. That work ended on October 5, 2026. The letter does not say how the intruder got in, whether ransomware was used, or how many people are being notified.

Why would a law firm hold my information?

The firm describes itself as a leader in high-profile class action and mass tort cases. The letter does not say whose files were affected or in which matters. Why you got a breach letter from a company you never dealt with explains how that happens, and law firm breach notices covers other firms in the log.

What information was involved?

The sample letter filed in California lists the person's name and leaves the rest as a blank field, filled in per letter. The state records give more. Massachusetts marks Social Security numbers, financial accounts and driver's licenses as involved, and medical records and card numbers as not involved. Vermont lists Social Security numbers, government ID numbers and health records. The two state records do not agree on health information, and the letter does not settle it; your own letter names what applies to you.

RecordResidentsInformation listed
Massachusetts, report 2026-1991243SSN, financial account, driver's license
Vermont, November 12, 202659SSN, government ID numbers, health records

Has the information been misused?

The firm says it has no evidence that anyone's information has been misused for identity theft or fraud. It says it has added measures to harden its environment, without naming them.

What is the firm offering, and by when must I enroll?

Free Experian IdentityWorks membership, with a credit report at sign-up, credit monitoring, identity restoration and up to $1 million in identity theft insurance. The sample letter leaves the number of months blank. The enrollment deadline is January 31, 2027, at 11:59 pm UTC. Questions go to 833-931-5437, Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to 9:00 pm Eastern. Credit monitoring offers in breach letters compares this offer with others in the log.

Why did the notice take more than a year?

The letter gives the order of events, not a reason for the timing: about a year of file review, then an address search that ended on October 5, 2026, then letters dated November 10. In this log, state breach notices from legal and professional services firms take a median of 148 days from discovery to disclosure (18 entries); this one took 401. The sector table shows the medians for every sector.

How this disclosure's timing compares

Levin, Sedran & Berman, LLP disclosed 401 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 206 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.

California's breach-notice rule

California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.

Other legal & professional services incidents on cisonews.net

All legal & professional services incidents

Sources

  1. 2026-11-10 · ALevin, Sedran & Berman, LLP, sample notice filed with the California Attorney General, published November 10, 2026
  2. 2026-11-12 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published November 12, 2026
  3. 2026-11-14 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report (checked November 14, 2026), published November 14, 2026
  4. 2026-11-14 · AVermont Attorney General, security breach notices (checked November 14, 2026), published November 14, 2026
  5. 2026-11-14 · ALevin Sedran & Berman, firm home page, published November 14, 2026
  6. undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting

Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.