Incident · State breach notice (California AG)
Unlimited Technology Systems breach: practice management software data copied in October 2025
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-14. By the cisonews.net Desk.
The Unlimited Technology Systems data breach affected 3,836,316 people, the total Unlimited Technology Systems LLC reported to Indiana's attorney general for notices sent on July 21, 2026, for a breach dated October 5, 2025. Unlimited Technology Systems, a company that sells practice management software to health care organizations, says an unauthorized actor copied patients' information from its commercial datacenter between October 5 and October 10, 2025. The federal health breach list counts 3,803,750 people, one of the five largest 2026 reports among its open cases. Recipients are offered two years of Kroll identity monitoring.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
What happened in the Unlimited Technology Systems breach?
Unlimited says it discovered unauthorized activity in its commercial datacenter on October 19, 2025. It hired a cybersecurity forensic firm, notified law enforcement and reviewed the data involved. The letter describes the company as a provider of practice management software to health care organizations and providers, which is why patients hear from a firm they may never have heard of.
| Date | What the letter and the regulators' records say |
|---|---|
| October 5 to 10, 2025 | The unauthorized actor copies data; October 5 is the breach date on the California, Washington and Indiana records |
| October 19, 2025 | Unlimited discovers the activity in its datacenter |
| July 21, 2026 | Report submitted to HHS; notice recorded by California and Washington; Indiana's report gives this as the date notice was sent |
| July 22, 2026 | Report logged in Massachusetts |
| July 23, 2026 | Posted on the Texas attorney general's list |
275 days passed between the discovery and the first regulator records. The notice delay study shows how that compares with other notices.
What information was involved?
The letter says the data may have included each person's name and one or more of these: health insurance and patient balance information, medical information such as medical record numbers, dates of service and diagnoses, scanned documents such as driver's licenses, other government IDs, insurance cards and intake forms, Social Security numbers, and other details such as date of birth, email, address and phone number. It says the types differ from person to person.
Unlimited says the data did not include full patient medical records, medical imaging or financial information such as credit card or bank account numbers. The state records agree on Social Security numbers and driver's licenses: Washington, Texas and Massachusetts all list them, and Massachusetts marks financial accounts and payment cards as not breached.
How many people were affected?
| Regulator | What it counts | Number |
|---|---|---|
| HHS Office for Civil Rights | Individuals affected | 3,803,750 |
| Indiana attorney general | Total affected, as reported to Indiana | 3,836,316 |
| Indiana attorney general | Indiana residents | 28,384 |
| Texas attorney general | Texans | 277,364 |
| Massachusetts consumer affairs office | Massachusetts residents | 2,223 |
| Washington attorney general | Washingtonians | 724 |
Indiana's total is 32,566 higher than the federal figure; neither record says why. The report ranks among the largest in the national ranking from Indiana's report and the Texas ranking.
What is Unlimited offering people who got a letter?
Unlimited is paying for two years of Kroll identity monitoring, with credit monitoring, fraud consultation and identity theft restoration.
| Item | Detail from the letter |
|---|---|
| Provider | Kroll |
| Length | Two years, at no cost |
| Enrollment | Enroll.krollmonitoring.com/redeem, with the activation code and verification ID on the letter |
| Deadline | Printed on each letter (blank in the filed copy); the code stops working after it |
| Phone | (844) 576-3063, Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, excluding major U.S. holidays |
The letter says Unlimited added security measures after the incident but does not describe them. The credit monitoring offers guide compares other offers, and the guide to letters from companies you never dealt with explains why a software vendor writes to patients.
What the documents leave open
- How the unauthorized actor got into the datacenter, and whether ransomware was involved.
- Which health care organizations' patients are affected; the letter does not name Unlimited's customers.
- Why the federal and Indiana totals differ by 32,566.
Why did I get a letter from Unlimited Technology Systems?
Your doctor's office or another health care organization used Unlimited's practice management software, and your information was in the data copied from Unlimited's datacenter. The letter does not name the organization.
Was my Social Security number exposed in the Unlimited Technology Systems breach?
Possibly. Social Security numbers are one of the categories the letter lists, and the state records include them, but the letter says the information involved differs from person to person. Your own letter lists what applies to you.
How this disclosure's timing compares
Unlimited Technology Systems disclosed 275 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 206 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.
California's breach-notice rule
California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.
Other health care incidents on cisonews.net
- MPOWERHealth Holdings LLC, Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Telecare Health, Breach notice, first disclosed November 9, 2026
- Sharecare Health Data Services, LLC, Breach notice, first disclosed November 6, 2026
- Nephrology Associates, P.C., Breach notice, first disclosed November 6, 2026
Sources
- 2026-07-21 · AUnlimited Technology Systems, LLC, sample individual notice filed with the California Attorney General, published July 21, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · ACalifornia Attorney General, list of submitted data security breach notices, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, breach portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AIndiana Attorney General, data breach year-to-date report (2026), published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · ATexas Attorney General, data security breach reports, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AWashington State Office of the Attorney General, data breach notifications list, published November 7, 2026
- undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.