Incident · State breach notice (Massachusetts)
OneDigital Investment Advisors data breach: client records copied from Salesforce through the Drift app
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-15. By the cisonews.net Desk.
OneDigital Investment Advisors, the advice arm of the Overland Park, Kansas firm OneDigital, says an unauthorized actor copied some of its client data from Salesforce between August 12 and August 18, 2025, through a compromise of the Drift chat application. The copied records held names with Social Security numbers or individual taxpayer identification numbers. Letters went out from April 8, 2026, nearly eight months after Salesforce told the firm. Massachusetts lists 1,826 residents and Vermont 35. WealthManagement.com, reading the firm's Maine filing, reports a total of up to 28,414 people.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| August 12 to 18, 2025 | Client data in OneDigital's Salesforce instance accessed and copied through Drift |
| August 22, 2025 | Salesforce notifies OneDigital of a possible security event involving Salesforce and Drift |
| April 8, 2026 | Letters begin; reports to Massachusetts (1,826) and Vermont (35) |
| April 10, 2026 | WealthManagement.com reports the Maine filing: up to 28,414 people, 73 in Maine |
What happened at OneDigital?
OneDigital did not get breached on its own network. Its counsel told Vermont that on August 22, 2025, Salesforce, its customer relationship management provider, notified it of a possible security event affecting Salesforce and Drift. The notice describes Drift as an online chat agent tool managed by Salesloft, OneDigital's former CRM provider. The letter to Massachusetts clients says it plainly: the incident involved a third-party application and did not compromise OneDigital's own internal network or systems.
So the route ran through an integration. The Drift connection had access to the firm's Salesforce data, and whoever compromised Drift used that access to copy records. WealthManagement.com cites a status update on the Drift breach saying it did not stem from a weakness in the core Salesforce platform but from a compromise of the Drift connection.
Why did the letters take eight months?
The notice gives the review as the reason. After the forensic investigation, OneDigital carried out what it calls a thorough and time-intensive review of the possibly affected data to find what sensitive customer information was in it. From Salesforce's notice on August 22, 2025 to the first letters on April 8, 2026 is 229 days. The notice delay guide compares that gap with other notices.
What information was exposed?
Name, Social Security number and individual taxpayer identification number, varying by person. Massachusetts also marks financial account information for its residents, which the Vermont notice does not list.
| Record | People | Data it marks |
|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts OCABR, report 2026-542 | 1,826 | Social Security numbers, financial accounts |
| Vermont AG notice, April 8, 2026 | 35 | Name, Social Security number, ITIN |
| Maine AG notice, as reported by WealthManagement.com | 28,414 total, 73 in Maine | Names and Social Security numbers |
What is OneDigital offering?
Credit and identity monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks. The Massachusetts letter offers twenty-four months. The Vermont notice describes twelve months. The firm says it is reviewing its policies, procedures and processes for storing sensitive information. With Social Security numbers and ITINs in the records, a credit freeze at the three bureaus is the stronger protection. The Vermont notice says the letters also include guidance on protecting against tax fraud. For other advisers' letters, see the guide to letters from CPA and advisory firms and the EP Wealth Advisors entry. The guide to letters from a company you never dealt with covers vendor breaches like this one.
What the documents leave open
- Who compromised the Drift application; the filings do not name an actor.
- The Maine filing itself could not be opened for this entry, so the 28,414 total is as WealthManagement.com reported it.
- Why the Massachusetts and Vermont monitoring terms differ.
How this disclosure's timing compares
OneDigital Investment Advisors LLC disclosed 229 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 222 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.
Other financial services incidents on cisonews.net
- ICW Group Holdings, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Point72 Asset Management, L.P., Breach notice, first disclosed November 5, 2026
- The Vanguard Group, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 4, 2026
- Hippo Analytics, Breach notice, first disclosed November 3, 2026; 176,128 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
- Baanx US Corp, Breach notice, first disclosed October 30, 2026; 6,594 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
Sources
- 2026-04-08 · AOneDigital Investment Advisors LLC, notice to the Vermont Attorney General through counsel, published April 8, 2026
- 2026-04-08 · AOneDigital Investment Advisors LLC, notice letter filed with the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, published April 8, 2026
- 2026-11-15 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report (checked November 15, 2026), published November 15, 2026
- 2026-04-10 · BWealthManagement.com, published April 10, 2026
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.