Skip to content
cisonews.net

Incident · State breach notice (California AG)

North Los Angeles County Regional Center data breach: 298,629 people, notified 19 months after the attack

Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-14. By the cisonews.net Desk.

North Los Angeles County Regional Center (NLACRC) reported a data breach affecting 298,629 people in total, the figure on Indiana's attorney general list. Its letter says an unauthorized actor was active in its computer systems from November 20 to December 1, 2024, and took a copy of some information before encrypting or encoding systems so they could not be used. Notices went out on June 30, 2026, 576 days after the activity ended. The center says it is unaware of any identity theft or fraud linked to the incident.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.

How many people were affected by the North Los Angeles County Regional Center data breach?

298,629 in total, the number NLACRC reported to Indiana. The letter and the California record give no count.

RegulatorWho it countsNumberRecorded
Indiana attorney generalTotal reported by NLACRC298,629Notice sent June 30, 2026
Indiana attorney generalIndiana residents20Notice sent June 30, 2026
California attorney generalNo count published—Recorded June 30, 2026

The ranking of 2026's largest breaches sets out the 25 largest and how the list is counted.

What happened, and when?

The center says it discovered suspicious activity on November 28, 2024, began an investigation and took steps to contain it. The letter lists the response: more monitoring, password changes, stronger password practices, a report to federal law enforcement and outside data security and privacy specialists.

DateEvent
November 20, 2024Unauthorized activity begins
November 28, 2024NLACRC discovers suspicious activity
December 1, 2024Unauthorized activity ends
June 30, 2026Notice sent (Indiana) and recorded (California)

Copying data and then encrypting systems is the pattern the ransomware glossary entry describes, though the letter itself does not use the word. It also does not say whether a ransom was demanded or paid.

Why did notices take 19 months?

The letter does not say. It states only that, after finding the intrusion, the center began analyzing information to confirm who was affected and notify them. Discovery to notice took 579 days. The guide to notice delays sets out the deadlines state laws and HIPAA set once a breach is found.

What information was involved?

Each letter fills in its own list of data elements, and the filed copy leaves that list blank. The letter says the investigation found no evidence that the information was misused for financial fraud or identity theft.

What should a recipient do?

ItemDetail from the letter
Help line(844) 959-7149, Monday to Friday, 6:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Pacific Time, excluding some U.S. national holidays
AdviceMonitor free credit reports, review account statements and report suspicious activity to financial institutions
EnclosureAn "Additional Resources" sheet with the three credit bureaus' contacts, free annual credit reports, fraud alerts and security freezes

California's record also holds a letter version whose file name refers to 12 months of credit monitoring; the copy fetched for this entry carries the same text as the standard letter. The guide to credit monitoring offers explains how such offers work.

What Massachusetts recorded

Massachusetts' Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation lists a report from North Los Angeles County Regional Center, received on June 30, 2026, with 10 Massachusetts residents affected. For those residents it marks Social Security numbers and medical records as breached.

What the documents leave open

  • Which data elements were involved, and for how many of the 298,629 people.
  • Who the people are: clients, families, staff or vendors.
  • How the intruder got in, and why notices came 576 days after the activity ended.

How this disclosure's timing compares

North Los Angeles County Regional Center disclosed 579 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 206 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.

California's breach-notice rule

California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.

Other health care incidents on cisonews.net

All health care incidents

Sources

  1. 2026-06-30 · ANorth Los Angeles County Regional Center, notice letter filed with the California Attorney General, published June 30, 2026
  2. 2026-06-30 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published June 30, 2026
  3. 2026-11-09 · AIndiana Attorney General, data breach year-to-date report (2026), published November 9, 2026
  4. 2026-11-09 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report, published November 9, 2026
  5. undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting

Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.