Incident · State breach notice (California AG)
Industrial Acceptance Corporation data breach: files taken in 2025, letters 458 days later
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-13. By the cisonews.net Desk.
The Industrial Acceptance Corporation data breach affected 79,216 people, the total Industrial Acceptance Corporation reported to Indiana's attorney general for notices sent on May 28, 2026, for a breach dated February 24, 2025. Industrial Acceptance Corporation (IAC) says it found unauthorized activity in its network on February 24, 2025, took its systems offline, and learned on or around March 4, 2025 that an unauthorized actor had taken files. Indiana's attorney general records 79,216 people affected in total, 334 of them in Indiana, with notice sent on May 28, 2026. That is 458 days after the company found the activity. Washington lists names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth, and Texas lists Social Security and driver's licence numbers. The letter offered 12 months of Cyberscout monitoring.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
What happened at Industrial Acceptance Corporation?
On February 24, 2025, IAC became aware of unauthorized activity in its network. It says it took its systems offline until it could restore operations safely, and worked with cybersecurity specialists on the investigation and the clean-up. It also reported the event to federal law enforcement.
About a week later, on or around March 4, 2025, the company learned that files had been taken. It then reviewed those files to find out whether they held personal information and whose. The review was completed on May 11, 2026. The letter does not say how the actor got in, does not mention ransomware or a group, and does not say what the files were for. It says the company has no evidence that anyone's information has been misused.
| Date | What happened | Source |
|---|---|---|
| February 22, 2025 | Breach date in California's and Washington's records | California and Washington records |
| February 24, 2025 | IAC becomes aware of unauthorized activity; systems taken offline; breach date in Indiana's record | Letter; Indiana record |
| On or around March 4, 2025 | IAC learns files were taken | Letter |
| May 11, 2026 | Review of the files completed | Letter |
| May 28, 2026 | Letter date; notice sent, per Indiana | Letter; Indiana record |
| May 29, 2026 | Texas publishes the report | Texas record |
| June 1, 2026 | Reported to Washington | Washington record |
The records disagree by two days on when it began. California gives February 22, 2025 as the date of the breach, and so does Washington. Indiana gives February 24, the day the letter says IAC became aware.
The 14-month review is the long part of the gap. Between learning that files were taken and finishing the review, 433 days passed; the letters followed 17 days after that. The guide to how long companies take to notify measures the same gap for other California filings in this log.
What information was in the Industrial Acceptance Corporation breach?
The filed sample leaves the list blank: its "What Information Was Involved?" section stops after "The information involved". The state records fill it in.
Washington's record lists name, Social Security number and full date of birth for 679 Washington residents. Texas's record lists Social Security numbers and driver's licence numbers.
| Data type | Washington record | Texas record |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes | Not listed |
| Social Security number | Yes | Yes |
| Date of birth | Yes | Not listed |
| Driver's licence number | Not listed | Yes |
Each state lists what was in its own residents' files, so the two lists can differ. Each letter as mailed lists that person's own items.
How many people were affected by the Industrial Acceptance Corporation breach?
Indiana gives the only total: 79,216 people.
| Record | People counted |
|---|---|
| Indiana attorney general, total | 79,216 |
| Texas residents | 2,706 |
| Washington residents | 679 |
| Indiana residents | 334 |
Texas published its report on May 29, 2026, the day after the letter date. The ranking of 2026 breaches by people affected shows where the Indiana total falls. The Texas ranking and the Washington ranking compare the state counts.
What is Industrial Acceptance Corporation offering?
Twelve months of credit monitoring and identity protection through Cyberscout, a TransUnion company, at no cost. Enrolment was at bfs.cyberscout.com/activate with the code in the letter, within 90 days of the letter date. Counting from May 28, 2026, that window closed in late August 2026. The guide to credit-monitoring offers compares this offer with others in this log.
| Item | Detail from the letter |
|---|---|
| Provider | Cyberscout (TransUnion) |
| Length | 12 months |
| Enrol by | Within 90 days of May 28, 2026 |
| Help line | 1-844-593-8423, Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern Time, for 90 days |
Was my information in the Industrial Acceptance Corporation data breach?
If you received a letter from Industrial Acceptance Corporation dated May 28, 2026, from a return processing center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, your information was in the taken files. The assistance line was 1-844-593-8423, Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern Time, with staff available for 90 days from the letter date. With a Social Security number in the files and the monitoring window closed, the letter's own advice still applies: check credit reports and account statements for activity you do not recognise. A free credit report is available from each of the three bureaus at annualcreditreport.com.
The guide to bank, brokerage and mortgage breach notices covers how other financial firms in this log describe their incidents.
What the notice leaves open
- How the unauthorized actor got into the network.
- What the taken files were, and what business relationship each reader had with IAC.
- Why the records give February 22 and the letter February 24.
- What each person lost; the sample leaves the list blank.
How this disclosure's timing compares
Industrial Acceptance Corporation disclosed 458 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 206 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.
California's breach-notice rule
California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.
Other financial services incidents on cisonews.net
- ICW Group Holdings, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Point72 Asset Management, L.P., Breach notice, first disclosed November 5, 2026
- The Vanguard Group, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 4, 2026
- Hippo Analytics, Breach notice, first disclosed November 3, 2026; 176,128 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
- Baanx US Corp, Breach notice, first disclosed October 30, 2026; 6,594 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
Sources
- 2026-05-28 · AIndustrial Acceptance Corporation, notice of data breach filed with the California Attorney General, published May 28, 2026
- 2026-11-10 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published November 10, 2026
- 2026-11-10 · AIndiana Attorney General, data breach year-to-date report (2026), published November 10, 2026
- 2026-11-10 · ATexas Attorney General, data security breach reports, published November 10, 2026
- 2026-11-10 · AWashington State Office of the Attorney General, data breach notifications list (page 2), published November 10, 2026
- undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.