Incident · State breach notice (New Hampshire DOJ)
Fresenius Kabi data breach: employee records on the network of its Ivenix subsidiary
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-15. By the cisonews.net Desk.
Fresenius Kabi USA says an unauthorized third party used valid credentials to get into the network of its U.S. subsidiary Ivenix between January 6 and January 9, 2026, and reached data that included employees' information. It learned of the incident on January 8, when the third party claimed to have accessed company data. Customer information was isolated from the affected network. Fresenius says it found no definitive evidence that data was taken. Letters went out on June 17, 2026. New Hampshire was told of about 131 residents and Massachusetts lists 285, with Social Security numbers, medical records, financial accounts, driver's licenses and card numbers all marked.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| January 6 to 9, 2026 | Unauthorized access to the Ivenix network with valid credentials |
| January 8, 2026 | Fresenius learns of a third party claiming to have accessed company data |
| After January 8, 2026 | Preliminary notice and interim credit monitoring offered to current employees |
| April 29, 2026 | Review finds the letter recipient's information among the affected data |
| June 17, 2026 | Letters; reports to Massachusetts (285) and New Hampshire (131) |
What happened at Fresenius Kabi?
The company found out from the attacker. Its letter says that on January 8, 2026, Fresenius became aware of a third party claiming to have accessed certain company data without authorization, and that it then brought in external forensic experts. The investigation placed the access between January 6 and 9, on a network associated with Ivenix. The notice to New Hampshire says the actor used valid credentials but does not say how they were obtained.
Counsel's notice to New Hampshire describes the response in more detail than most notices do. The steps included network-level containment that isolated affected systems, restricted external connectivity, restored key system backups and ran threat hunting across the environment. Fresenius's security tools automatically contained at least one compromised device. Later fixes include upgraded firewalls, wider deployment of endpoint detection and response (EDR), and more logging.
Was data stolen from Fresenius Kabi?
Fresenius says it cannot show that it was. Its investigation had not found definitive evidence that the third party successfully exfiltrated any data. The letter to individuals puts it the same way: its findings do not indicate that the third party downloaded any information. The third party's own claim to have accessed company data is what started the investigation.
What information was exposed?
The letter lists name, contact details, date of birth, government identification such as Social Security number, driver's license number or passport information, financial account information, and certain medical information. The notice to New Hampshire says the data included employees' information. Massachusetts marks all five categories.
| Record | People | Data it marks |
|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts OCABR, report 2026-991 | 285 | SSNs, medical records, financial accounts, driver's licenses, card numbers |
| New Hampshire DOJ notice, June 17, 2026 | about 131 | SSN, driver's license or financial account number |
What is Fresenius Kabi offering?
Twenty-four months of Experian credit monitoring at no cost. Current employees were offered interim monitoring earlier, with the preliminary notice. Former employees whose records were on the Ivenix network may be hearing about it for the first time from the June letter. For how these offers compare, see the credit monitoring guide. For other incidents where the attacker's claim came first, see the double extortion guide.
What the documents leave open
- How the valid credentials were obtained, and who made the January 8 claim.
- The total number of people notified across all states.
- Whether any data was published.
How this disclosure's timing compares
Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC disclosed 160 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 222 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.
Other life sciences & medical devices incidents on cisonews.net
- Dexcom, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Boston Scientific, 8-K Item 1.05, first disclosed August 26, 2026
- Amgen, 8-K Item 1.05, first disclosed July 31, 2026; 39,594 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
- iRhythm Holdings, 8-K Item 1.05, first disclosed June 15, 2026; 8,179,772 affected in total (HHS Office for Civil Rights)
- West Pharmaceutical Services, 8-K Item 1.05, first disclosed May 11, 2026
Sources
- 2026-06-17 · AFresenius Kabi USA, LLC, notice to the New Hampshire Attorney General through counsel, published June 17, 2026
- 2026-06-17 · AFresenius Kabi USA, LLC, notice letter filed with the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, published June 17, 2026
- 2026-11-15 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report (checked November 15, 2026), published November 15, 2026
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.