Incident · State breach notice (California AG)
Figure Lending data breach: bank account and routing numbers taken in a database query
Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-13. By the cisonews.net Desk.
The Figure data breach affected 39,866 people, the total Figure Technology Solutions Inc reported to Indiana's attorney general for notices sent on February 24, 2026, for a breach dated January 28, 2026. Figure, a lender specializing in blockchain-enabled home equity lines of credit and crypto-backed loans, says that on January 28, 2026 data containing personal information was pulled through queries on its databases of loans and loan inquiries. Its letter says names, addresses, bank account numbers and routing numbers were obtained, and that Social Security numbers were not affected. Indiana's attorney general records 39,866 people in total, and Washington 26,128 Washingtonians. Figure offers two years of TransUnion monitoring.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.
What happened at Figure?
Figure says it found unauthorized activity on its systems, stopped it, brought in a cybersecurity firm and reported the incident to law enforcement. It says there was no evidence of access to customer accounts or funds, and its operations carried on.
Figure also provides technology and loan administration for partner lenders. So someone whose loan came through one of those lenders can be affected without having borrowed from Figure directly. Washington lists a separate notice from New American Funding, which says Figure Lending had the incident.
| Date | What the letter and the regulators' records say |
|---|---|
| January 28, 2026 | Data obtained through database queries |
| February 23, 2026 | Notice recorded by California and Washington (26,128); logged in Massachusetts (146) |
| February 24, 2026 | Indiana's notice date (39,866 total); posted by Texas (323) |
| February 27, 2026 | New American Funding's Washington notice (699), naming Figure Lending |
| May 31, 2026 | Deadline to enroll in the monitoring offer |
Notice reached regulators 26 days after the data was taken.
How did hackers get into Figure?
Through an employee, according to the company. A Figure spokesperson told TechCrunch on February 13, 2026 that the breach began when an employee was tricked in a social engineering attack, which let the hackers take a limited number of files. The ShinyHunters group claimed the attack on its leak site. It said Figure had refused to pay a ransom and published 2.5 gigabytes of data it said was stolen. A member of the group told TechCrunch that Figure was one of the victims of a campaign against companies that use Okta for single sign-on. That is the group's account, and Figure has not confirmed it.
How many email addresses were in the Figure leak?
Have I Been Pwned, which loads published breach data so people can check their own address, lists 967.2k email addresses for Figure. It says the data, dating back to January 2026, held over 900,000 unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers, physical addresses and dates of birth. That count covers the published files. It is far larger than any regulator count above (Indiana's total is 39,866), and no document explains the gap. The letters describe bank account and routing numbers being taken, and those fields are not on Have I Been Pwned's list.
| Count | What it measures | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Have I Been Pwned | Email addresses in the published data | 967.2k |
| Indiana attorney general | People notified in total | 39,866 |
| Washington attorney general | Washingtonians notified (Figure notice) | 26,128 |
Were Social Security numbers exposed in the Figure breach?
Figure's letter says no. The state records do not all agree:
| Source | Social Security numbers |
|---|---|
| Figure's letter | Not affected |
| Washington attorney general (Figure notice) | Listed |
| Washington attorney general (New American Funding notice) | Listed |
| Massachusetts consumer affairs office | Marked as breached |
| Texas attorney general | Listed |
The documents do not explain the difference. Anyone whose letter lists only bank details should still watch their bank account, because an account number with its routing number is what the letter says was taken.
How many people were affected?
| Regulator | What it counts | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana attorney general | Total affected | 39,866 |
| Washington attorney general | Washingtonians (Figure notice) | 26,128 |
| Washington attorney general | Washingtonians (New American Funding notice) | 699 |
| Texas attorney general | Texans | 323 |
| Indiana attorney general | Indiana residents | 204 |
| Massachusetts consumer affairs office | Massachusetts residents | 146 |
What is Figure offering?
Two years of credit monitoring and identity restoration through TransUnion, with enrollment by May 31, 2026.
| Item | Detail from the letter |
|---|---|
| Provider | TransUnion |
| Length | Two years |
| Enrollment deadline | May 31, 2026 |
The guide to bank, brokerage and mortgage breach notices compares other lenders' letters.
What the documents leave open
- Whether the ShinyHunters claim and the Okta campaign link are accurate; Figure has said only that an employee was tricked.
- Why the Washington, Massachusetts and Texas records list Social Security numbers.
- Which partner lenders' borrowers were affected besides New American Funding's.
California's breach-notice rule
California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.
Other financial services incidents on cisonews.net
- ICW Group Holdings, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 13, 2026
- Point72 Asset Management, L.P., Breach notice, first disclosed November 5, 2026
- The Vanguard Group, Inc., Breach notice, first disclosed November 4, 2026
- Hippo Analytics, Breach notice, first disclosed November 3, 2026; 176,128 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
- Baanx US Corp, Breach notice, first disclosed October 30, 2026; 6,594 affected in total (Indiana Attorney General)
Sources
- 2026-02-23 · AFigure Lending Corp, U.S. individual notice of data breach filed with the California Attorney General, published February 23, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AIndiana Attorney General, data breach year-to-date report (2026), published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AWashington State Office of the Attorney General, data breach notifications list, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-11-07 · ATexas Attorney General, data security breach reports, published November 7, 2026
- 2026-02-13 · BTechCrunch, Fintech lending giant Figure confirms data breach, published February 13, 2026
- 2026-11-12 · BHave I Been Pwned, Figure Data Breach, published November 12, 2026
- undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting
Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.
Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket
Wednesdays
Unsubscribe any time.