Skip to content
cisonews.net

Incident · State breach notice (California AG)

DentaQuest data breach: dental and vision health information accessed and posted online

Compiled from public records. Updated 2026-11-14. By the cisonews.net Desk.

The DentaQuest data breach affected 29,000,000 people, the total DentaQuest LLC reported to Indiana's attorney general for notices sent on July 17, 2026, for a breach dated May 17, 2026. DentaQuest, which runs dental and vision benefits for health plans, discovered on May 20, 2026 that unauthorized individuals had accessed data on its computer network, and its letters say the information they reached was posted on the internet. The federal health breach list records 15,000,000 people affected, the largest 2026 report on it. Adults and children who got a letter are offered 24 months of identity monitoring from Kroll.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.

What happened in the DentaQuest data breach?

DentaQuest says it later learned that the incident began on May 17, 2026 and ended by May 20, 2026. It says it took action to secure the network, reported the incident to law enforcement and began an investigation with outside cybersecurity experts. After its review it found that each recipient's personal information had been accessed and posted on the internet.

The letters do not say how the intruders got in, who they were, or where the data was posted. The federal list classes the breach as a hacking or IT incident on a network server.

DateWhat the letters and the regulators' records say
May 17, 2026The incident begins; date of breach on California's record and Washington's list
May 20, 2026DentaQuest discovers the access; the incident has ended by this date
July 16, 2026Notice recorded by California's attorney general and Washington's attorney general; report logged in Massachusetts; report submitted to HHS
July 17, 2026Posted on the Texas attorney general's list; Indiana's report gives this as the date notice was sent

57 days passed between the discovery and the first regulator records. Federal health privacy rules require notice to individuals without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 calendar days after discovery. The filed letters carry no date of their own, so the mailing date is not known. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule entry explains the deadlines, and the notice delay study shows how other organizations compare.

What information was involved in the DentaQuest breach?

The letter says the information included each person's name, other personal identifiers that the filed copy leaves as a blank field, and dental or vision health information such as provider names, diagnoses, treatments and billing information.

The state records fill in the blank field. Washington's list names Social Security numbers, full dates of birth, health insurance policy or ID numbers, medical information and protected health information. Texas's list adds addresses. Massachusetts' report marks Social Security numbers and medical records as breached, and financial accounts, driver's licenses and payment card numbers as not breached.

Information typeLetterWashingtonTexasMassachusetts
NameYesYesYes
Social Security numberBlank fieldYesYesYes
Date of birthBlank fieldYesYes
AddressYes
Health insurance policy or ID numberYesYes
Dental, vision or medical informationYesYesYesYes
Financial accountNo
Driver's licenseNo
Credit or debit card numberNo

A blank cell means the source does not mention that type. Not every person's letter lists the same items: the filed copy fills the list from a data field for each recipient.

How many people were affected by the DentaQuest data breach?

The regulators' records give different totals, and none of the filings explains the gap.

RegulatorWhat it countsNumber
HHS Office for Civil RightsIndividuals affected15,000,000
Indiana attorney generalTotal affected, as reported to Indiana29,000,000
Indiana attorney generalIndiana residents139,500
Texas attorney generalTexans3,973,000
Massachusetts consumer affairs officeMassachusetts residents1,905,700
Washington attorney generalWashingtonians153,300

Its 139,500 Indiana residents make it the fifth largest of the 1,361 notices sent in 2026 in Indiana's report (Indiana ranking).

On each state list, DentaQuest's report sits at or near the top for 2026. It is the largest of the year in the Massachusetts ranking, second in the Texas ranking and in the national ranking from Indiana's report, and fifth in the Washington ranking. The state counts are residents only and cannot be added to the federal figure.

Why did I get a letter from DentaQuest?

DentaQuest writes to people whose health plan uses it, or used it, for dental or vision benefits. Many recipients know the plan rather than DentaQuest itself. The guide to letters from companies you never dealt with explains how that happens.

DentaQuest filed three versions of the letter with California: one for adults, one addressed to the parent or guardian of a child, and one addressed to the family of a person who has died.

What is DentaQuest offering people who got a letter?

Adults are offered Kroll identity monitoring for 24 months at no cost, with credit monitoring, fraud consultation and identity theft restoration. The children's version offers the same 24 months with minor identity monitoring in place of credit monitoring. The version sent to families of people who have died offers no monitoring; it describes DentaQuest's security changes and the steps families can take.

ItemDetail from the letter
ProviderKroll
Length24 months, at no cost
EnrollmentEnroll.krollmonitoring.com/redeem, with the activation code and verification ID printed on the letter
Deadline90 days from the date the letter was mailed
Phone1-844-959-7163, Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Central Time, excluding major U.S. holidays

To get Kroll's credit services, a person must be over 18, have established credit in the U.S., have a Social Security number in their name and have a U.S. residential address on their credit file. The credit monitoring offers guide compares what other notices offer.

What DentaQuest says it changed

The letter says DentaQuest brought in cybersecurity experts, gave employees more training, added new security measures and increased monitoring. It does not describe the measures.

What the documents leave open

  • How the unauthorized individuals got into the network, and whether ransomware was involved. The letters do not say.
  • Where the data was posted, and whether it is still available.
  • Why the federal total (15,000,000) and the total reported to Indiana (29,000,000) differ.
  • When the letters were mailed. The filed copies carry a date placeholder, and the 90-day enrollment window runs from that date.

Is the DentaQuest breach letter real?

DentaQuest filed its letters with California's attorney general, which posts them on its breach record for the company. A letter that matches the filed copy gives the Kroll number 1-844-959-7163 and the enrollment site Enroll.krollmonitoring.com/redeem. Calling the number printed in the filed copy, rather than one in an unexpected email, is the safer check.

How long do I have to sign up for DentaQuest's Kroll monitoring?

90 days from the date the letter was mailed. The date is printed on each letter; the filed copies leave it blank.

Was my Social Security number exposed in the DentaQuest breach?

It may have been. Washington, Texas and Massachusetts all record Social Security numbers among the information involved. Each letter lists the items for that person, so the letter you received is the answer for your own data.

How this disclosure's timing compares

DentaQuest disclosed 57 days after the discovery date its notice gives. Across the 206 other state breach notices on cisonews.net that date discovery to the day, the median gap is 100 days.

California's breach-notice rule

California's breach law (Civil Code § 1798.82 for businesses, § 1798.29 for state agencies) requires any person or business that must notify more than 500 California residents of a single breach to submit one sample copy of that notice to the Attorney General electronically. The California Attorney General's breach list, where this notice was found, is built from those submissions. Source: California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting. The guide Data breach laws by state: notice deadlines and attorney general thresholds in 23 states reads the rule in full, and the glossary defines Breach notification law.

Other health care incidents on cisonews.net

All health care incidents

Sources

  1. 2026-07-16 · ADentaQuest LLC, adult notification letter filed with the California Attorney General, published July 16, 2026
  2. 2026-07-16 · ADentaQuest LLC, minor notification letter filed with the California Attorney General, published July 16, 2026
  3. 2026-07-16 · ADentaQuest LLC, deceased notification letter filed with the California Attorney General, published July 16, 2026
  4. 2026-11-07 · ACalifornia Attorney General, data breach notification record, published November 7, 2026
  5. 2026-11-07 · ACalifornia Attorney General, list of submitted data security breach notices, published November 7, 2026
  6. 2026-11-07 · AU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, breach portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), published November 7, 2026
  7. 2026-11-07 · AIndiana Attorney General, data breach year-to-date report (2026), published November 7, 2026
  8. 2026-11-07 · AElectronic Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 164.404 (notification to individuals), published November 7, 2026
  9. 2026-11-07 · ATexas Attorney General, data security breach reports, published November 7, 2026
  10. 2026-11-07 · AMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report, published November 7, 2026
  11. 2026-11-07 · AWashington State Office of the Attorney General, data breach notifications list, published November 7, 2026
  12. undated · ACalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reporting

Tier A: the organization itself (including notices it filed with a state attorney general), a regulator or SEC EDGAR. Tier B: established press. Each fact on this page carries its supporting passage in the page source.

Entries like this one, in Wednesday’s docket

Wednesdays

Unsubscribe any time.